|
In recent years I’ve expressed concern about our nation’s lukewarm shipbuilding budget, not just regarding vessels to be built at Mississippi’s Northrop Grumman Ingalls shipyard, but for our entire naval shipbuilding plan. That’s because, time and time again, history has proven that it is nations with an ability to project power and protect interests which endure. This has benefited America since President Thomas Jefferson dispatched our young Navy to Libya in 1801 and defeated pirates who were threatening our merchant ships. It’s still true today as we fight terrorists who threaten us all. Thankfully, some in Washington seem to be reaffirming that seaborne tradition. The last few months have brought us a new Secretary of the Navy and a new Chief of Naval Operations (CNO), and I’m pleased to report that this shuffle seems to have given this administration a new appreciation of our shipbuilding budget and priorities. In fact, the President’s budget for fiscal year 2007 contains $8.2 billion to build seven ships. That’s well up from the fiscal year 2006 budget which funded only four ships. A lot of this re-emphasis on the shipbuilding budget is coming from the new CNO Admiral Mike Mullen. I met with Admiral Mullen just last week about the Navy’s shipbuilding plan. Of those seven new ships he outlined to me, five of them have ties to Northrop Grumman Ingalls.
The President’s shipbuilding budget includes
partial funding for the groundbreaking DD(X) destroyer – a project In fact, though we in Pascagoula are quite used to competing with other shipbuilding yards like our old rival Bath Iron Works, in Maine, the Congressional shipbuilding caucus has joined together to insist that the DD(X) program move forward with both Bath and Ingalls building these ships together. We feel our nation is best served by this partnership because DD(X) will keep our few remaining shipyards on the frontlines of our nation’s defense. Without DD(X) it was quite possible either Bath or Ingalls could have exited the surface combatant business, leaving thousands of skilled shipbuilders without jobs and likely out of a job forever, since shipyards can’t just close for a while and reopen at a later date. Congress rejected the idea of making these two yards re-compete the DD(X) contract because a majority understand that this is not really an economic, budgetary or regional issue, but a matter of national security. Most Americans understand that having one or more of our shipyards go out of business could result in America’s having to contract with foreign shipyards and foreign shipbuilders to construct America’s future fleet. That’s clearly repugnant to everyone with an appreciation for America’s long and storied maritime tradition and our position as a naval power. We’ve still got some work to do. As Admiral Mullen and others would probably tell you, Congress will need to appropriate more than $13 billion a year in the coming years, just to maintain a strength of 300-plus ships. That’s far short of the 600-ship navy which President Ronald Reagan and Senator John Stennis championed at the height of the Cold War. However, it is significantly higher than the shipbuilding budgets we were facing just a few years ago, when we barely expected to field 100 ships. America is again reasserting our maritime tradition. That is good news for the 11,000 Mississippians at Northrop Grumman Ingalls, and for every American whose lives these ships and crews will protect, and whose national interest they will project. Senator Lott welcomes any questions or comments about this column. Write to: U.S. Senator Trent Lott, 487 Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20510 (Attn: Press Office) or Email: senatorlott@lott.senate.gov
|